ANTHROPOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE NATURE OF CONFLICT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Abstract
Abstract. Setting objectives. Modern society is a complex, dynamic, holistic system. Rational understanding of the causes of its occurrence, patterns of development and functioning cannot be complete and comprehensive without a deep penetration into the essence and content of the contradictions inherent in this society. The purpose of the article is to investigate the problems of conflict management, prevent destructive conflicts as destabilizing public relations, destroy relations between its members, and contribute to the adequate and effective resolution of constructive conflicts, which, unlike destructive conversions, lead to such positive consequences, that unite the collective, society, etc. Research results. Each political system adapts its mechanism of conflict resolution to the relevant conditions that have emerged in society and the outside world, the mentality of the people, the state of public consciousness, and urgent administrative needs. It is mediated by the ideological precepts of the ruling class, the dominant mode of production, the level of openness of society, the nature of social ties (plastic or rigid), the level of legitimacy of the regime, and so on. However, the ability to tolerate and respect all sides of the conflict in a tolerant manner and in such situations is an important element, a way of humanizing the public consciousness, a testament to citizens' responsibility, maturity and democratic readiness. Conclusions. Modern Ukrainian state formation is accompanied by conflicts between branches of power, different political forces and the public, individual political leaders and society, local and central authorities, between the authorities and the people. Conflict-free public administration is impossible, so the need to prevent and prevent the development of destructive conflicts, which are mostly subjective in nature, and to resolve objectively contradictions of public administration in a constructive way, requires scientific understanding and development of appropriate mechanisms that would enable them to diagnose them. the earliest stage.
References
2. Брегеда А. Ю. Соціологія: навч.-метод. посібник для самостійного вивчення дисципліни. – Київ: КНЕУ, 1999. – 124 с. 3. Ємельяненко Л. М. Конфліктологія: навч. посібник. – Київ: КНЕУ, 2003. – 315 с. 4. Бойчук М. А. Влада і громадянське суспільство: механізми взаємодії. – Київ, 2013. – 207 с.
5. Гірник А. Конфлікти: структура, ескалація, залагодження. – Київ: Вид-во Соломії Павличко "Основи", 2003. – 172 с.
6. Громадянське суспільство в сучасній Україні: специфіка становлення, тенденції розвитку / За заг. ред. Ф. М. Рудича. – Київ: Парлам. вид-во, 2006. – 412 с.
7. Громадянське суспільство та публічна політика: метод. рек. до практ. та семінар. занять / Уклад.: С. І. Вировий, О. Р. Титаренко, І. В. Рейтерович. – Київ: НАДУ, 2009. – 28 с.
8. Громадянське суспільство як здійснення свободи: центрально-східноєвропейський досвід / За ред. А. Карася. – Львів : Львів. нац. ун-т ім. І. Франка, 1999. – 384 с.